MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hypersonic nozzle for laser-spectroscopy studies at 17 K characterized by resonance-ionization-spectroscopy-based flow mapping

2021· article· en· W3206718042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Ferrer, M. Verlinde, E. Verstraelen, Arno Claessens, M. Huyse, Sandro Kraemer, Yu. Kudryavtsev, Jekabs Romans, P. Van den Bergh, P. Van Duppen, A. Zadvornaya, Olivier Chazot, Guillaume Grossir, V. I. Kalikmanov, M. Nabuurs, Dominiek Reynaerts

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVlaamse regeringHorizon 2020KU LeuvenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean Commission
KeywordsSpectroscopyNozzleJet (fluid)Hyperfine structureIonizationArgonMaterials sciencePhotoionizationAtomic physicsHypersonic speedLaserChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsPhysicsIonMechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The in-gas-jet laser spectroscopy method relies on the production of uniform and low-temperature gas jets to fully resolve the atomic hyperfine structure and efficiently determine fundamental nuclear properties of short-lived isotopes from, e.g., the hardly accessible actinide and transactinide elements. In this article we present the studies devoted to designing, producing, and characterizing the flow properties of a convergent-divergent (de Laval) hypersonic nozzle with a superior performance for laser spectroscopy applications. A novel flow mapping technique, based on resonance ionization spectroscopy (RIS), has been employed to characterize the local flow properties of an argon gas jet formed by this nozzle, revealing a 61.5-mm long, highly collimated atomic jet at a uniform low temperature of 16.6(5) K [Mach 8.11(12)] that will enable laser spectroscopy experiments on heavy-exotic nuclei with an unprecedented spectral resolution and a high efficiency. These results have been compared with those obtained by planar laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy (PLIFS) studies and show a good agreement between the two techniques and a significant improvement in efficiency of the RIS mapping method with respect to PLIFS. The data are compared to state-of-the-art fluid-dynamics calculations that were carried out to obtain the nozzle contour and simulate its performance, as well as to explain the observation of a possible onset of argon nucleation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207