MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206732483 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2021.3119920

Mitigation of Mode Partition Noise in VCSEL-MMF Links by Optimizing Launch Conditions

2021· article· en· W3206732483 on OpenAlexafffund
Shanglin Li, Mohammadreza Sanadgol Nezami, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsVertical-cavity surface-emitting laserMulti-mode optical fiberOffset (computer science)Partition (number theory)Computer scienceBridging (networking)LaserNoise (video)Electronic engineeringFrequency domainPhysicsOpticsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceMathematicsOptical fiberEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multimode characteristics of vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) sources lead to mode partition noise (MPN) impairing high-speed multimode fiber (MMF) links. In this letter, we propose a low-cost and straightforward MPN mitigation scheme by optimizing the launch condition between the VCSEL and the MMF. The dependence of the MPN on launch conditions is theoretically assessed. Simulation shows that the mode power redistribution induced by rearranging the launch condition has great potential to reduce the MPN. Experiments are carried out to demonstrate the MPN reduction. In our case, using a 15- <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> radial offset between the VCSEL and the MMF, we observe efficient noise suppression in both the frequency domain and the time domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207