Stability of glutathione added as a supplement to parenteral nutrition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most very premature newborns (<32 weeks of gestation) receive parenteral nutrition (PN) that is inherently contaminated with peroxides. Oxidative stress induced by PN is associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, a main pathological complication in these infants who have weak antioxidant capacity to detoxify peroxides because of their glutathione deficiency. In animals, glutathione supplementation of PN prevented oxidative stress and alveolar loss (the main characteristic of bronchopulmonary dysplasia). Of its two forms-oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and reduced glutathione (GSH)-GSSG was used because of its better stability. However, a 30% loss of GSSG in PN is observed. The potentially high therapeutic benefits of GSSG supplementation on the health of very premature infants make the study of its stability highly important. METHODS: GSSG was incubated in combination with the following components of PN: dextrose, multivitamins, Primene, and Travasol, and with cysteine, cystine, and peroxides, for 24 h. Total glutathione in these solutions was measured 0-24 h after the addition of GSSG. RESULTS: The combination of cysteine and multivitamins caused the maximum loss of glutathione. The stability of GSSG was not affected by multivitamins. The cysteine was responsible for ∼20% of the loss of GSSG; in the presence of multivitamins, the loss reached >70%. Removing the cysteine prevented the degradation of glutathione. CONCLUSION: GSSG reacts with cysteine to form cysteine-glutathione mixed disulfide, another suitable glutathione substrate for preterm neonates. The study confirms that GSSG added to PN can potentially provide a precursor to de novo synthesis of glutathione in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".