MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206781650 · doi:10.33232/bims.0076.79.81

D. Rosenthal et al.: A Readable Introduction to Real Mathematics

2015· article· en· W3206781650 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert A. Harte

Bibliographic record

VenueIrish Mathematical Society Bulletin · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMathematics educationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book comes with a public health warning: very hard to put down.Contrary to the impression given by its possibly over-loud title -probably deriving from the excitement of the bridging course in Toronto -this book is basically a new and refreshing introduction to number theory.In outline, in twelve chapters, it progresses from the natural numbers and induction through modular arithmetic, the "fundamental theorem of arithmetic" and the Euclidean algorithm to the RSA method of public key encryption.After a look at complex numbers and the cardinality of infinite sets, it goes on to discuss "plane geometry", ruler-and-compass constructibility, and surds.But the heart of it is the number theory: prime factorization, the φ function, the Euclidean algorithm, Fermat's and Wilson's theorem, here put to work in the service of RSA and public key encryption.This reviewer has always been a little afraid of number theory: all that stuff about phi functions and prime number density has seemed arcane and irrelevant, very far away from "real mathematics".Now. after immersing himself in this little book, number theory begins to make sense."Uncle Petros", fronting for Apostolos Doxiadis [1], tells his nephew that "addition is natural, but multiplication is artificial".To see what he is getting at just, on day two of your introductory course, write out the first few natural numbers in factorized form: 1, 2, 3, 2 2 , 5, 2 • 3, 7, 2 3 , 3 2 , 2 • 5, 11, 2 2 3, 13, 2 • 7, 3 • 5, 2 4 , 17, 2 • 3 2 , 19 : is there any discernible pattern?Number theory is born out of the attempt to answer that question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIrish Mathematical Society BulletinSame topicChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionFrench-language works237,207