MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 19 MW, 12.5 B, 2.1 MS/S SINGLE-BIT DS ADC IN 0.18 MM DIGITAL CMOS PROCESS

2021· article· en· W3206782637 on OpenAlexaff
Mona Safi-Harb, Gordon W. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueSYNCHROINFO JOURNAL · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOversamplingCMOSDelta-sigma modulationComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringEffective number of bitsSwitched capacitorElectrical engineeringLow-power electronicsDissipationDynamic rangeVoltagePower (physics)CapacitorEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasingly stringent requirements of today’s communication systems and portable devices are imposing two challenges on the design of high-resolution, high-speed ADCs and delta-sigma modulators (DSMs) in particular. The first is the extension of the input frequency range to include applications where the input bandwidth exceeds the 1 MHz range, while maintaining a feasible sampling frequency. The challenge in extending the operational speed of DSMs is further rendered more complicated by the ever shrinking transistor dimension, and in turn, the supply voltage, hence the second challenge. To address those two challenges, the DSMs presented in this paper targets a minimum of 12 bits in resolution at 2 MS/s Nyquist conversion rate, while using a single 1.8 V supply and minimum power dissipation.A switched-capacitor (SC) DS ADC integrated circuit (IC) with output rate slightly exceeding 2 MS/s was successfully implemented in a 1.8 V, 0.18 mm standard CMOS process. The IC consists of a fourth-order, multi-stage (2-1-1), single-bit modulator sampled at an oversampling rate of 50 MHz. Special effort has been made to reduce the power consumption of the modulator through careful system-level modeling and synthesis of circuit specifcations. Experimental results reveal a 77.6 dB dynamic range while consuming 18.8 mW of power, making it the lowest power dissipation for output rates in excess of 2 MS/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSYNCHROINFO JOURNALSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207