MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206789196 · doi:10.1109/tap.2021.3118811

Gradient-Based Electromagnetic Inversion for Metasurface Design Using Circuit Models

2021· article· en· W3206789196 on OpenAlexafffund
Chaitanya Narendra, Trevor Brown, Puyan Mojabi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersScience and Engineering Research CouncilCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsAdmittanceInversion (geology)Inverse problemComputer scienceInverseMicrowaveAmplitudeOpticsAlgorithmPhysicsElectrical impedanceMathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A gradient-based optimization algorithm that is capable of directly designing a metasurface at the circuit parameter level for a desired field (amplitude and phase) pattern or a desired power (phaseless) pattern on some region of interest (ROI) external to the metasurface boundary is presented. Specifically, the inversion algorithm designs the microwave admittance profile of each subwavelength element of the metasurface when a three-layer admittance model is assumed. To this end, a forward model that maps the admittance profile of each layer of the metasurface to the desired field on the ROI is developed. Then, for the inverse design problem, a data misfit cost functional is defined and minimized over the unknown admittance profile using analytically derived gradients and step lengths. The developed inversion algorithm is then utilized to design metasurfaces capable of beam forming in the far-field zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207