MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206807852 · doi:10.21105/joss.03669

TE-dependent analysis of multi-echo fMRI with tedana

2021· article· en· W3206807852 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth DuPré, Taylor Salo, Zaki Ahmed, Peter A. Bandettini, Katherine L. Bottenhorn, César Caballero‐Gaudes, Logan T. Dowdle, Javier González-Castillo, Stephan Heunis, Prantik Kundu, Angela R. Laird, Ross D. Markello, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Stefano Moia, Isla Staden, Joshua Teves, Eneko Uruñuela, Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam, Kirstie Whitaker, Daniel A. Handwerker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthAlan Turing Institute
KeywordsEcho (communications protocol)PsychologyNuclear magnetic resonanceNeuroscienceComputer sciencePhysicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a popular method for in vivo neuroimaging. Modern fMRI sequences are often weighted towards the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal, which is closely linked to neuronal activity This weighting is achieved by tuning several parameters to increase the BOLD-weighted signal contrast. One such parameter is "TE," or echo time. TE is the amount of time elapsed between when protons are excited (the MRI signal source) and measured. Although the total measured signal magnitude decays with echo time, BOLD sensitivity increases The optimal TE maximizes the BOLD signal weighting based on a number of factors, including several MRI scanner parameters (e.g., field strength), imaged tissue composition (e.g., grey vs. white matter), and proximity to air-tissue boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations174
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207