Robust Correlation Clustering with Asymmetric Noise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph clustering problems typically aim to partition the graph nodes such that two nodes belong to the same partition set if and only if they are similar. Correlation Clustering is a graph clustering formulation which: (1) takes as input a signed graph with edge weights representing a similarity/dissimilarity measure between the nodes, and (2) requires no prior estimate of the number of clusters in the input graph. However, the combinatorial optimization problem underlying Correlation Clustering is NP-hard. In this work, we propose a novel graph generative model, called the Node Factors Model (NFM), which is based on generating feature vectors/embeddings for the graph nodes. The graphs generated by the NFM contain asymmetric noise in the sense that there may exist pairs of nodes in the same cluster which are negatively correlated. We propose a novel Correlation Clustering algorithm, called \anormd, using techniques from semidefinite programming. Using a combination of theoretical and computational results, we demonstrate that $\texttt{$\ell_2$-norm-diag}$ recovers nodes with sufficiently strong cluster membership in graph instances generated by the NFM, thereby making progress towards establishing the provable robustness of our proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".