MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3206827112 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.008

Bloodstream Infections and Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Study

2021· article· en· W3206827112 on OpenAlexaff
Abel Santos Carreira, María Queralt Salas, Mats Remberger, Igor Novitzky‐Basso, Arjun Law, Wilson Lam, Ivan Pašić, Dennis Kim, Fotios V. Michelis, Auro Viswabandya, Armin Gerbitz, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Shahid Husain, Rajat Kumar, Jonas Mattsson

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationHazard ratioInternal medicineUnivariate analysisHematopoietic stem cell transplantationIncidence (geometry)Single CenterGraft-versus-host diseaseSurgeryMultivariate analysisConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the single-center incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections (BSIs) in 651 adults who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) between 2015 and 2019 and explored the impact of these BSIs on post-transplantation outcomes. Antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was given during the aplastic phase. Overall, the median patient age was 57 years, 79.7% of patients received an alternative donor graft, and 68.7% received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as part of their graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Of the 651 patients, 358 (55.0%) had at least 1 episode of BSI, and the overall mortality rate secondary to this complication was 7.5% (12.6% among those diagnosed with at least 1 episode of BSI). BSI was more often diagnosed during the first 30 days (58.7%), and gram-positive bacteria were the most prevalent microorganisms isolated during the entire post-transplantation follow-up (62%). A high Disease Risk Index (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; P < .029) and receipt of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis (HR, 3.33; P < .001) were identified as risk factors for BSI. Additionally, univariate analysis showed that patients diagnosed with a BSI during post-transplantation follow-up had worse overall survival (HR, 2.48; P < .001) and higher nonrelapse mortality (HR, 2.68; P < .001) than those without BSI. In conclusion, alloHCT recipients with a BSI had a higher risk of mortality compared with those who did not develop BSI. The inclusion of PTCy as part of GVHD prophylaxis was identified as an independent risk factor for BSI during early post-transplantation follow-up. Single-center analyses focused on reporting the incidence and risk factors for BSI highlight the need for active implementation of preemptive strategies to decrease BSI incidence in the alloHCT setting. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→