MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3206851769 · doi:10.1093/jas/skab235.429

PSVII-27 Genetic analysis of disease resilience of nursery-to-finish pigs under a natural disease challenge model using reaction norms

2021· article· en· W3206851769 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jian Cheng, Kyu‐Sang Lim, Austin M. Putz, Anna Wolc, John C. S. Harding, Michael K. Dyck, Frédéric Fortin, Graham Plastow, Jack C. M. Dekkers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCentre de Développement du Porc du QuébecUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of SaskatchewanHendrix Genetics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeritabilityDiseaseLinear regressionNorm (philosophy)StatisticsRegressionBiologyAnimal scienceVeterinary medicineMedicineMathematicsInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disease resilience is the ability of an animal to maintain performance across environments with different disease challenge loads (CL) and can be quantified using random regression reaction norm models that describe phenotype as a function of CL. Objectives of this study were to: 1) develop measures of CL using growth rate and clinical disease phenotypes under a natural disease challenge; 2) evaluate genetic variation in disease resilience. Data used were late nursery and finisher growth rates and clinical disease phenotypes, including medical treatment and mortality rates, and subjective health scores, collected on 50 batches of 60/75 crossbred (LRxY) barrows under a polymicrobial natural disease challenge. All pigs were genotyped using a 650K SNP panel. Different CL were derived from estimates of contemporary group effects and used as environmental covariates in reaction norm analyses of average daily gain (ADG) and treatment rate (TRT). The CL were compared based on model loglikelihoods and estimates of genetic variance, using both linear and cubic spline reaction norm models. Linear reaction norm models fitted the data significantly better than the standard genetic model and the cubic spline models fitted the data significantly better than the linear reaction norm model for most traits. CL based on early finisher ADG provided the best fit for nursery ADG, while CL based on clinical disease phenotypes was best for finisher ADG and TRT. With increasing CL, estimates of heritability for ADG initially decreased and then increased, while estimates of heritability for TRT generally increased with CL. Genetic correlations were low between ADG or TRT at high versus low CL but high for close CLs. Results can be used to select more resilient pigs across different CL levels, or high-performance animals at a given CL level, or a combination of these. Funded by Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, USDA-NIFA, and PigGenCanada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→