Modeling the Linux page cache for accurate simulation of data-intensive applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of Big Data in recent years has resulted in a growing need for efficient data processing solutions. While infrastructures with sufficient compute power are available, the I/O bottleneck remains. The Linux page cache is an efficient approach to reduce I/O overheads, but few experimental studies of its interactions with Big Data applications exist, partly due to limitations of real-world experiments. Simulation is a popular approach to address these issues, however, existing simulation frameworks do not simulate page caching fully, or even at all. As a result, simulation-based performance studies of data-intensive applications can lead to misleading results and inaccurate conclusions.In this paper, we propose an I/O simulation model that captures the key features of the Linux page cache. We have implemented this model as part of the WRENCH workflow simulation framework, which itself builds on the popular Sim-Grid distributed systems simulation framework. Our model and its implementation enable the simulation of both single-threaded and multithreaded applications, and of both writeback and writethrough caches for local or network-based filesystems. We evaluate the accuracy of our model in different conditions, including sequential and concurrent applications, as well as local and remote I/Os. We find that our page cache model reduces the simulation error by up to an order of magnitude when compared to state-of-the-art, cacheless simulations. Our model is publicly available in the WRENCH framework, making it usable in a wide range of simulation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".