MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206910181 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3024

Growth and dissipation of Be star discs in misaligned binary systems

2021· article· en· W3206910181 on OpenAlexafffund
M. W. Suffak, C. E. Jones, A. C. Carciofi

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsPhysicsOrbital planePrecessionOrbit (dynamics)AstrophysicsOrbital eccentricityRADIUSBinary starCircular orbitAccretion (finance)Orbital decayCircumbinary planetEccentricity (behavior)Orbital inclinationAstronomyBinary numberStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We use a three-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics code to simulate growth and dissipation of Be star discs in systems where the binary orbit is misaligned with respect to the spin axis of the primary star. We investigate six different scenarios of varying orbital period and misalignment angle, feeding the disc at a constant rate for 100 orbital periods, and then letting the disc dissipate for 100 orbital periods. During the disc growth phase, we find that the binary companion tilts the disc away from its initial plane at the equator of the primary star before settling to a constant orientation after 40–50 orbital periods. While the mass-injection into the disc is ongoing, the tilting of the disc can cause material to reaccrete on to the primary star prematurely. Once disc dissipation begins, usually the disc precesses about the binary companion’s orbital axis with precession periods ranging from 20 to 50 orbital periods. In special cases, we detect phenomena of disc tearing, as well as Kozai–Lidov oscillations of the disc. These oscillations reach a maximum eccentricity of about 0.6, and a minimum inclination of about 20○ with respect to the binary’s orbit. We also find the disc material to have highly eccentric orbits beyond the transition radius, where the disc changes from being dominated by viscous forces, to heavily controlled by the companion star, in contrast to its nearly circular motion inwards of the transition radius. Finally, we offer predictions to how these changes will affect Be star observables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207