MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3206981172 · doi:10.21037/jtd-21-1064

Respiratory manifestations of Marfan syndrome: a narrative review

2021· review· en· W3206981172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Disease · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarfan syndromeMedicinePectus excavatumFibrillinScoliosisRespiratory systemDiseasePathologyElastinLungConnective tissueBioinformaticsCardiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of Marfan syndrome (MFS) is estimated to be 1 in 10,000 to 15,000 individuals, but the phenotype of MFS may not be apparent and hence its diagnosis may not be considered by clinicians. Furthermore, the effects of MFS on the lungs and breathing are underrecognized despite the high morbidity that can occur. The objective of this Narrative Review is to delineate the molecular consequences of a defective fibrillin-1 protein and the skeletal and lung abnormalities in MFS that may contribute to respiratory compromise. It is important for clinicians to be cognizant of these MFS-associated respiratory conditions, and a contemporaneous review is needed. BACKGROUND: ) gene, resulting in abnormal elastic fibers as well as increased tissue availability of transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ), both of which lead to the protean clinical abnormalities. While these clinical characteristics are most often recognized in the cardiovascular, skeletal, and ocular systems, MFS may also cause significant impairment on the lungs and breathing. METHODS: We searched PubMed for the key words of "Marfan syndrome," "pectus excavatum," and "scoliosis" with that of "lung disease," "breathing", or "respiratory disease." The bibliographies of identified articles were further searched for relevant articles not previously identified. Each relevant article was reviewed by one or more of the authors and a narrative review was composed. CONCLUSIONS: gene mutation can induce a variety of effects on the respiratory system, inducing substantial morbidity and potentially increased mortality. These respiratory effects may include chest wall and spinal deformities, emphysema, pneumothorax, sleep apnea, and potentially increased incidence of asthma, bronchiectasis, and interstitial lung disease. Further research into approaches to prevent respiratory complications is needed, but improved recognition of the respiratory complications of MFS is necessary before this research is likely to occur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it