From GWAS variant to function: A study of ∼148,000 variants for blood cell traits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified hundreds of thousands of genetic variants associated with complex diseases and traits. However, most variants are noncoding and not clearly linked to genes, making it challenging to interpret these GWAS signals. We present a systematic variant-to-function study, prioritizing the most likely functional elements of the genome for experimental follow-up, for >148,000 variants identified for hematological traits. Specifically, we developed VAMPIRE: Variant Annotation Method Pointing to Interesting Regulatory Effects, an interactive web application implemented in R Shiny. This tool efficiently integrates and displays information from multiple complementary sources, including epigenomic signatures from blood-cell-relevant tissues or cells, functional and conservation summary scores, variant impact on protein and gene expression, chromatin conformation information, as well as publicly available GWAS and phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) results. Leveraging data generated from independently performed functional validation experiments, we demonstrate that our prioritized variants, genes, or variant-gene links are significantly more likely to be experimentally validated. This study not only has important implications for systematic and efficient revelation of functional mechanisms underlying GWAS variants for hematological traits but also provides a prototype that can be adapted to many other complex traits, paving the path for efficient variant-to-function (V2F) analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".