MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advances in New Matter Properties and Applications of Hybrid Graphene-Based Metamaterials

2021· article· en· W3207053805 on OpenAlexaff
A. Guillermo Bracamonte

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Materials Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersSecretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
KeywordsMetamaterialGrapheneNanotechnologyElectronicsMaterials sciencePhotonicsNanomaterialsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Graphene as an organic material has attracted special attention due to its electronic and conductive properties. Moreover, its highly conjugated chemical structures and relatively easy modification have allowed varied design and control of targeted properties and applications. In addition, this nanomaterial with pseudo-electromagnetic fields has led to the emergence of photonics, electronics and quantum interactions with their surroundings, generating new properties of materials. This short review aims at discussing many of these studies of new materials based on graphene for light and electronic interactions, conductions and new modes of nonclassical light generation. These new materials and metamaterials are being developed. For this reason, some representative examples from research with potential applications have been shown and discussed, in addition to their incorporation in real advanced devices and miniaturized instrumentation. Accordingly, this special issue entitled “Design and Synthesis of Hybrid Graphene-based Metamaterials” is intended to review the state-of-the-art in this multidisciplinary field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Materials ScienceSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207