O Ecossocialismo de Rojava: a potência da práxis do comum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho propoe uma leitura ecossocialista aliada a teoria hardtnegriana do comum acerca dos movimentos de resistencia em Rojava iniciados em 2012 no seio do Oriente Medio. Dessa forma, objetivando opor a expansao exploratoria e destruidora do capitalismo e do Estado, na primeira secao, examinamos a teoria acerca do ecossocialismo proposta por Michael Lowy, destacando suas principais contribuicoes e limites. Verificou-se que para alcancar toda a radicalidade de uma proposta ecossocialista e necessario pensa-la contraria tambem a uma dimensao proprietaria, aproximando-a, assim, ao conceito de “comum” de Michael Hardt e Antonio Negri. Desse modo, na segunda secao, discute-se o conceito hardtnegriano de “comum”, tensionando-o com a teoria dos comuns, consolidada por Elinor Ostrom, e com o principio do comum proposto por Pierre Dardot e Christian Laval. Por fim, na terceira secao, demonstra-se como Rojava configura uma experiencia ecossocialista, com a producao e partilha constante do comum, fundando um mundo anticapitalista e antiestatal em que os seres humanos e o meio ambiente estao integrados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".