The Radiographic “Air Sign” in Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Timing of extubation on post-mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) surgery is critical, given that at baseline these infants have difficult airways and failed extubation requires either re-intubation of an already complex airway with a fragile, recently osteotomized mandible, or adjunctive airway measures such as CPAP that may apply unwanted pressure to the surgical site. Thus, the goal is to plan extubation when the risk of failure is minimal. Currently, there is a void in the literature addressing the timing of extubation post-MDO and no objective sign of extubation readiness has been elucidated. This study describes a simple clinical pearl to assist in the evaluation of extubation readiness in these patients. Postoperatively, we obtain weekly radiographs to assess distractor stability and advancement, and to assess for the "Air Sign". The Air Sign describes a radiolucent space (air) visualized in the oropharynx on lateral radiographs, likely indicating that the tongue based airway obstruction has been relieved by mandibular advancement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".