MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207142104 · doi:10.1080/23802359.2021.1989337

Phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of the Blomfild’s Beauty butterfly <i>Smyrna blomfildia</i> (Fabricius 1781) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Nymphalini)

2021· article· en· W3207142104 on OpenAlexafffund
Mackenzie R. Alexiuk, Melanie M. L. Lalonde, Jeffrey M. Marcus

Bibliographic record

VenueMitochondrial DNA Part B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNymphalidaeBiologyMitochondrial DNAPhylogenetic treeSister groupLepidoptera genitaliaPhylogeneticsGenomeEvolutionary biologyGeneticsZoologyCladeGeneBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Blomfild’s Beauty butterfly Smyrna blomfildia (Fabricius 1781) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Nymphalini) is a sexually dimorphic species found in Mexico, Central, and South America. Males are territorial and are more vibrantly colored than females. Genome skimming by Illumina sequencing allowed the assembly of a complete circular mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of 15,149 bp from S. blomfildia consisting of 83.9% AT nucleotides, 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNAs, two rRNAs, and a control region in the typical butterfly gene order. The S. blomfilda COX1 gene features an atypical start codon (CGA) while ATP6, COX1, COX2, CYTB, ND1, ND3, ND4, and ND5 display partial stop codons completed by the addition of 3’ A residues to the mRNA. Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction places Smyrna as a member of the tribe Nymphalini and sister to a clade containing genera Araschnia, Vanessa, Polygonia, and Aglais, which differs from its classic taxonomic placement in tribe Coeini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMitochondrial DNA Part BSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207