Femtosecond nearly resonant self-focusing in gold nanorod colloids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We evaluate the threshold power for self-focusing in gold nanorod colloids of varying concentration by a power limiting method in the femtosecond filamentation regime. The pulses are tuned near the longitudinal plasmon peak of the nanorods, leading to saturation of linear absorption and reshaping of the particles. We evaluated the last two effects by optical transmission measurements and spectroscopic analysis and estimated that considerable particle deformation does not occur before the collapse of the beam. We performed numerical simulations based on the experimental results, and evaluated only a subtle, monotonically increasing enhancement of the nonlinear refractive index of the host material (water) as the nanoparticles concentration increases. The role of higher-order contributions is discussed. Our work provides an alternative characterization approach of ultrafast nonlinearities in absorbing media. It further emphasizes that self-focusing of intense femtosecond pulses in gold nanocomposites is hampered by the ultrafast modulation of the susceptibility of the metal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it