EVALUASI SISTEM PROTEKSI BAHAYA KEBAKARAN PADA GEDUNG BADAN PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA ACEH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Kantor Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Aceh (BPBA) merupakan Kantor Pemerintah yang memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat dalam pelaksanaan kegiatan penanggulangan bencana secara terencana, terpadu, dan menyeluruh dalam tahapan prabencana, saat tanggap darurat, dan pasca bencana. Salah satu hal yang penting dalam penanggulangan kebakaran adalah Emergency Response. Emergency Response dapat diartikan sebagai kecepatan penanganan kebakarannya, sebagai upaya pencegahan dan penanggulangannya agar manusia, bangunan gedung dan lingkungannya terhindar dari bahaya kebakaran yang lebih luas. Metode yang digunakan mix method menggabungkan antara kualitatif dan kuantitatif dengan pengumpulan data yaitu menggunakan data sekunder berupa peta kota Banda Aceh, Layout Gedung Kantor BPBA, Literatur-literatur, Permen PU, Jurnal yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini dan data primer yang terdiri dari pengamatan terhadap kondisi Kantor BPBA, wawancara, kuesioner. Responden yang digunakan adalah semua pegawai yang bekerja di Kantor BPBA berjumlah 115 orang dikurangi pilot study 30 orang. Dari analisis data penelitian terhadap 26 (dua puluh enam) variable dapat dijelaskan bahwa ada 7 (tujuh) variable yang mendapat skor kecil atau kurang baik dan dapat diartikan bahwa pada bagian variabel tersebut butuh perhatian untuk dilakukan perubahan. Strategi yang dapat dilakukan berdasarkan analisi SWOT adalah membentuk tim siaga tanggap darurat kebakaran yang dibekali dengan pendidikan dan pelatihan secara terencana terpadu dan menyeluruh; menyusun Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) penanggulangan bencana kebakaran berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan; melakukan simulasi kebakaran gedung secara rutin dan kontinyu; serta memperkuat sistem proteksi aktif lainnya diantaranya adalah membuat hidran air, alarm kebakaran dan smoke detector. Kata Kunci: Bencana, Emergency Response, Sistem Proteksi, Penanggulangan Kebakaran Abstract The Aceh Disaster Management Agency office is a government office that provides services to the community in implementing disaster management activities in a planned, integrated and comprehensive manner in the pre-disaster, emergency response and post-disaster stages. One of the important things in fire prevention is "Emergency Response". Emergency Response can be interpreted as the speed of handling a fire, as an effort to prevent and overcome it so that people, buildings and their environment are protected from a wider fire hazard. The methodology used is the mix method combining qualitative and quantitative data with data collection, namely using secondary data in the form of a Banda Aceh City Map, BPBA Office Building Layout, literature, Permen PU, journals related to this research and primary data consisting of observations of conditions BPBA office, interview, questionnaire. The respondents used are all employees who work in the BPBA office, amounting to 115 people minus the pilot study of 30 people. From the analysis of research data on 26 (twentysix) variables, it can be explained that there are 7 (seven) variables that score small or poorly and it can be interpreted that those variables need attention to make changes. A strategy that can be carried out based on a SWOT analysis is to form a fire emergency response team that is equipped with education and training in an integrated and comprehensive plan; prepare Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for fire disaster management based on statutory regulations; conduct building fire simulations routinely and continuously; as well as strengthening other active protection systems, including making water hydrants, fire alarms and smoke detectors. Keywords: Disaster, Emergency Response, Protection System, Fire Prevention
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".