Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Infusion During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Management of hematopoietic stem cell transplant complicated by respiratory failure has been facilitated by the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to curative chemotherapeutic options. This is the first report of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the adult population. CASE SUMMARY: A 28-year-old woman diagnosed with idiopathic aplastic anemia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to pneumonia required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to supplement oxygenation and ventilation. She received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation while she was on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. MAIN RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Delivery of the stem cell through extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit was successful in the described patient. There was no sequestered stem cell in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit, and she was found to have 90% donor chimerism suggesting successful engraftment. This report showed that infusion of stem cell through extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit is safe and feasible, and our results suggest that successful engraftment is possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".