MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207269482

기술자료 : 특허정보를 활용한 습식 이산화탄소 포집 기술동향 분석

2015· article· ko· W3207269482 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이윤석, 이수진, 이정구, 홍순직

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Korean Society for Heat Treatment · 2015
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasChinaCarbon capture and storage (timeline)Patent analysisBusinessNatural resource economicsPolitical scienceClimate changeData scienceComputer scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As recognized by all scientific and industrial groups, carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and sequestration (CCS) could play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This paper is aimed at identifying evolving technological trends from the objective information of patents related to carbon capture technology by solvent. In this study the patents applied in korea, japan, china, canada, US, EU from 1993 to 2013 were analyzed. The result of patent analysis could be used for RD Revised August 17, 2015; Accepted September 1, 2015)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Korean Society for Heat TreatmentSame topicEngineering Applied ResearchFrench-language works237,207