Vitamin C Differentially Impacts the Serum Proteome Profile in Female and Male Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A suboptimal blood vitamin C (ascorbate) level increases the risk of several chronic diseases. However, the detection of hypovitaminosis C is not a simple task, as ascorbate is unstable in blood samples. In this study, we examined the serum proteome of mice lacking the gulonolactone oxidase (Gulo) required for the ascorbate biosynthesis. Gulo –/– mice were supplemented with different concentrations of ascorbate in drinking water, and serum was collected to identify proteins correlating with serum ascorbate levels using an unbiased label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry global quantitative proteomic approach. Parallel reaction monitoring was performed to validate the correlations. We uncovered that the serum proteome profiles differ significantly between male and female mice. Also, unlike Gulo –/– males, a four-week ascorbate treatment did not entirely re-establish the serum proteome profile of ascorbate-deficient Gulo –/– females to the optimal profile exhibited by Gulo –/– females that never experienced an ascorbate deficiency. Finally, the serum proteins involved in retinoid metabolism, cholesterol, and lipid transport were similarly affected by ascorbate levels in males and females. In contrast, the proteins regulating serum peptidases and the protein of the acute phase response were different between males and females. These proteins are potential biomarkers correlating with blood ascorbate levels and require further study in standard clinical settings. The complete proteomics data set generated in this study has been deposited to the public repository ProteomeXchange with the data set identifier: PXD027019.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".