Shear Properties of Cemented Paste Backfill under Low Confining Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cemented paste backfill (CPB) plays an important role in the mining industry due to safety, cost efficiency, and environmental benefits. Studies on CPB have improved the design and application of paste backfill in underground mines. Direct shear is one of the most fundamental parameters for assessing backfill strength. This study harnesses direct shear tests to explore the low confining stress behavior of CPB. We perform all the tests in a standard apparatus on the combination of three binder contents of 4.2%, 6.9%, and 9.7% CPB with four curing times of 3, 7, 14, and 28 days, respectively. The applied confining stress levels vary in a range according to the in situ regime. Results are presented by strength envelope, stress‐strain property, and shear strength with curing time and binder content. The data suggest that the shear strength follows the Mohr–Coulomb envelope in which the shear strength and behavior are time and binder content dependent. In addition, the results show that shear strength is strongly related to the binder content than the curing time, namely, the higher the degree of binder hydration, the higher the cementation binding force between CPBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".