MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207346171 · doi:10.1080/02739615.2021.1973900

Parental and Health Care Professionals' Experiences Caring for Medically Fragile Infants on Pediatric Inpatient Units

2021· article· en· W3207346171 on OpenAlex
Lyndsay Jerusha MacKay, Karen Benzies, Shelley Raffin Bouchal, Chantelle Barnard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren s Health Care · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute
KeywordsStressorBurnoutGrounded theoryHealth professionalsMedicineNursingMental healthPsychologyHealth careClinical psychologyPsychiatryQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parents of hospitalized Medically Fragile Infants (MFI) experience stressors and mental health difficulties and Health-Care Professionals (HCP) who care for MFI experience burnout and stress. A constructivist grounded theory study was conducted among parents of MFI (N = 19) and HCP (N = 26) to understand their experiences caring for MFI in pediatric inpatient units. As parents and HCP engaged in beneficial interactions, trust was formed, and they established supportive relationships. When beneficial interactions did not occur, trust was fractured and parents and HCP were unsuccessful in establishing supportive relationships. Supportive relationships aided parents and HCP to journey alongside one another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it