MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207365252 · doi:10.34098/2078-3949.36.1.3

REVISIONES CRÍTICAS DE ESTABILIDAD Y DE POTENCIAL DE FOTOSENSIBILIZADOR DE FERROCIANUROS METÁLICOS: UN POSIBLE MINERAL PREBIÓTICO PARTE III.

2019· article· es· W3207365252 on OpenAlexaff
Brij Bhushan Tewari, D. Usmanali, Glen A. Soobramani, Sharlene Roberts, Mancy Abbas, Tricia Grant, Ashish Tiwari, Shivanand Singh, Marc V. Boodhoo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Boliviana de Química · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsZincHumanitiesChemistryMineralogyNuclear chemistryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los ferrocianuros de cobre, lantano, mercurio, molibdeno, plata, titanio y zinc se sintetizaron y caracterizaron mediante análisis elemental y estudios espectrales. La estabilidad de los ferrocianuros metálicos sintetizados se registró en calor (varias temperaturas), varias concentraciones de ácidos (HCl, H2SO4, HNO3, CH3 COOH) varias concentraciones de bases (NaOH, KOH, NH4OH), y en agua de mar y de grifo. Todas las estabilidades se registraron a temperatura ambiente y de ebullición. La estabilidad de los ferrocianuros metálicos sintetizados también se registró en presencia de radiación visible y ultravioleta. El potencial oxidante y fotosensibilizante de los ferrocianuros metálicos sintetizados se probó con yoduro de potasio y la solución de almidón recién preparada indicó que el ferrocianuro de cobre es un posible oxidante fuerte y fotosensibilizador. Se descubrió que los ferrocianuros de molibdeno, mercurio y tungsteno actúan como oxidante débil y fotosensibilizador. El lantano y el ferrocianuro de zinc no mostraron ningún potencial oxidante y fotosensibilizante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Boliviana de QuímicaSame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207