MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207374256 · doi:10.1177/2329048x211031059

Neurophysiological Characteristics of Allgrove (Triple A) Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review

2021· article· en· W3207374256 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueChild Neurology Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalNewborn Screening OntarioChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersGenome AlbertaGenome British ColumbiaOntario Genomics InstituteGenome Canada
KeywordsNeurophysiologyPolyneuropathyMagnetic resonance neurographyPeripheral nervous systemSpasticityElectromyographyDystoniaMicroneurography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allgrove or “Triple A” syndrome is characterized by alacrima, achalasia, and adrenocorticotropic hormone-resistant adrenal insufficiency, as well as central and peripheral nervous system involvement. Patients demonstrate heterogeneity with regard to their age of symptom onset, disease severity, and nature of clinical symptoms. Neurophysiological testing has also shown variability ranging from: motor neuron disease with prominent bulbar involvement, motor-predominant neuropathy, or sensorimotor polyneuropathy with axonal or mixed axonal and demyelinating features. We report an 11-year-old boy who presented with neurological symptoms of progressive spasticity and peripheral neuropathy. His neurophysiological testing confirmed a sensorimotor polyneuropathy with axonal and demyelinating features. Exome sequencing identified compound heterozygote variants in the AAAS gene. We summarize the neurophysiological findings in him and 29 other patients with Allgrove syndrome where nerve conduction study findings were available thereby providing a review of the heterogeneity in neurophysiological findings that have been reported in this rare disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild Neurology OpenSame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207