The histology of sutures in chicken skulls: Types, conservation, and ontogeny
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sutures are fibrous joints that occur between bone elements in vertebrate skulls, where they play a variety of roles including facilitating skull growth and function. In addition, a variety of studies examining sutures from diverse perspectives in many taxa have enabled the determination of anatomical homologs. Surprisingly, one important aspect of sutures-histology-remains unknown in the key model organism of the chicken. To fill this gap in our knowledge, we generated histological sections of six different cranial sutures across a range of developmental stages in embryonic chicken. Despite having a skull that is largely co-ossified or fused as an adult, we found that the types, components, and ontogeny of sutures in chicken skulls are very similar to sutures in other vertebrates. We did, however, find a new transient stage in the ontogeny of sutures between endochondral bone elements, in which one element has ossified and one was still cartilaginous. Moreover, to better understand the morphogenetic events at the onset of suture formation, we compared the developmental histology of six sutures with that of the space between the two ossification centers of the frontal-a location expected to be void of suture structures. We found that the mesenchymal cells in sutures condense and form a middle vascular layer. This was not found to be the case in the space between the two ossifications of the frontal, where instead only osteoid occurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".