Far-ultraviolet Variables in M31: Concentration in Spiral Arms and Association with Young Stars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Andromeda galaxy (M31) is an object of ongoing study with the Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (UVIT) on AstroSat. Field 2, which is 6.4 kpc in diameter at the distance of M31, includes a substantial part of the NE spiral arms of the galaxy. We have obtained a second observation of Field 2 with the far-ultraviolet (FUV) F148W (148 nm) filter, separated from the first observation by 1465 days. Both observations are analyzed to detect sources that are variable at a >3σ confidence level. For sources with less than ∼2″ separation, we apply multi-Gaussian fits, to obtain reliable magnitudes in the presence of source crowding. The variable sources are found to be concentrated in the spiral arms, with fraction of variable to nonvariable sources ∼2 times higher than for interarm regions, indicating an association of FUV variables with young stellar populations. UVIT FUV-NUV color–magnitude diagrams confirm the association of FUV variables with young massive/hot stars. Using existing catalogs, we obtain counterparts for 64 of the 82 most variable sources (>5σ). The counterparts include 13 star clusters, three ionized hydrogen (H ii) regions, three novae, one S Doradus star, eight eclipsing binaries, 20 foreground sources, two regular variables, and 14 unspecified variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".