MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207563954 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ac2e1a

Lamb wave damage severity estimation using ensemble-based machine learning method with separate model network

2021· article· en· W3207563954 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Syed Haider Mehdi Rizvi, Muntazir Abbas

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIslamic University of MadinahUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsStructural health monitoringComputer scienceLamb wavesEnsemble learningSpline interpolationOrientation (vector space)Energy (signal processing)Spline (mechanical)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringMathematicsStructural engineeringSurface waveStatisticsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lamb wave-based damage estimation have great potential for structural health monitoring. However, designing a generalizable model that predicts accurate and reliable damage quantification result is still a practice challenge due to complex behavior of waves with different damage severities. In the recent years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been proven to be an efficient tool to analyze damage-modulated Lamb wave signals. In this study, ensemble-based ML algorithms are employed to develop a generalizable crack quantification model for thin metallic plates. For this, the scattering of Lamb wave signals due to different configuration of crack dimension and orientation is extensively studied. Various finite element simulations signals, representing distinct crack severities in term of crack length, penetration and orientation are acquired. Realizing that both temporal and spectral information of signal is extremely important to damage quantification, three time-frequency (TF) based damage sensitive indices namely energy concentration, TF flux and coefficient of energy variance are proposed. These damage features are extracted by employing smoothed-pseudo Wigner–Ville distribution. After that data augmentation technique based on the spline-based interpolation is applied to enhance the size of the dataset. Eventually, these fully developed damage dataset is deployed to train ensemble-based models. Here we propose separate model network, in which different models are trained and then link together to predict new and unseen datasets. The performance of the proposed model is demonstrated by two cases: first simulated data incorporated with high artificial noises are employed to test the model and in the second scenario, experimental data in raw form are used. Results indicate that the proposed model has the potential to develop a general model that yields reliable answer for crack quantification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Materials and StructuresSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207