Lamb wave damage severity estimation using ensemble-based machine learning method with separate model network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lamb wave-based damage estimation have great potential for structural health monitoring. However, designing a generalizable model that predicts accurate and reliable damage quantification result is still a practice challenge due to complex behavior of waves with different damage severities. In the recent years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been proven to be an efficient tool to analyze damage-modulated Lamb wave signals. In this study, ensemble-based ML algorithms are employed to develop a generalizable crack quantification model for thin metallic plates. For this, the scattering of Lamb wave signals due to different configuration of crack dimension and orientation is extensively studied. Various finite element simulations signals, representing distinct crack severities in term of crack length, penetration and orientation are acquired. Realizing that both temporal and spectral information of signal is extremely important to damage quantification, three time-frequency (TF) based damage sensitive indices namely energy concentration, TF flux and coefficient of energy variance are proposed. These damage features are extracted by employing smoothed-pseudo Wigner–Ville distribution. After that data augmentation technique based on the spline-based interpolation is applied to enhance the size of the dataset. Eventually, these fully developed damage dataset is deployed to train ensemble-based models. Here we propose separate model network, in which different models are trained and then link together to predict new and unseen datasets. The performance of the proposed model is demonstrated by two cases: first simulated data incorporated with high artificial noises are employed to test the model and in the second scenario, experimental data in raw form are used. Results indicate that the proposed model has the potential to develop a general model that yields reliable answer for crack quantification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".