MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207589824 · doi:10.23977/acss.2021.050112

Research on the Data Mining Tools and Algorithms of Cross-Border e-Commerce under the Atmosphere of the International Epidemic

2021· article· en· W3207589824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsE-commerceChinaBusinessConsumption (sociology)Supply chainAtmosphere (unit)CommerceIndustrial organizationComputer scienceMarketingPolitical scienceGeographyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China's cross-border e-commerce industry has developed rapidly, sales have risen steadily, policies and policies have been continuously introduced, e-commerce consumption mode has been continuously optimized, and logistics facilities are increasingly perfect. However, under the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic, the cross-border e-commerce industry has broken out with problems such as the industrial chain interruption, poor logistics chain, broken capital chain and insufficient talent export. In view of the challenges and opportunities faced by China's cross-border e-commerce industry under the impact of the epidemic, this paper analyzes the application of data mining tools and algorithms in cross-border e-commerce, aiming to provide certain help for the development of cross-border e-commerce under the international epidemic atmosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it