Understanding Identity Negotiation of Parkinson’s Disease and Occupational Engagement Using Narrative Inquiry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims Many older adults with Parkinson’s disease experience challenges negotiating identity, often with negative implications for wellbeing. This study explores how older adults with Parkinson’s disease negotiate identity post-diagnosis, specifically addressing how they recount their management of identity and its impact on their occupational engagement.Methods Using a constructivist narrative approach, three participant sessions were conducted with five older adults with Parkinson’s disease. Line-by-line and thematic coding was completed.Results Three major themes emerged across narratives including: (a) Attempts to convey, maintain, and negotiate identity; (b) Resisting a disabled identity and (c) The centrality of occupation and social roles in negotiating identity.Conclusion Common themes of personal and social identity that threaten or support an older adult with PD’s decisions about occupational engagement were identified. Results of this study can be used by occupational therapists to better understand the influence of identity on occupational engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it