MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207671836 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v10n6p22

A Unified General Class of Interdistributional Income Inequality Measures Based on Weighted Incomplete Moments

2021· article· en· W3207671836 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fahad Aldossary, T. H. M. Abouelmagd, Amani A. Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIncome, Poverty, and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInequalityClass (philosophy)Income distributionEconometricsIndex (typography)Economic inequalityValue (mathematics)Mathematical economicsMeasure (data warehouse)Distribution (mathematics)Lorenz curveStatisticsGini coefficientComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many authors have proposed measures for between groups income inequalities. Mostly, these measures are based on functional of the income distribution. Others are based on Gini index, measures of entropies or additive functions. Butler and McDonald (1987) developed a class of between groups income inequality measures based on incomplete moments and showed its applicability. In this article, A unified class of interdistributional inequality measures are introduced. Most of previous measures are special cases from the new class, such as Butler-McDonald measures. These new measures are estimated and studied. Also, the new general class is based on probability weighted moments which can be given any values as the upper value. A real data application is presented to compare among all these measures and show the benefits of the new measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicIncome, Poverty, and InequalityFrench-language works237,207