MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207686858 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.12153339.v1

Mechanochemical Reactions of Cocrystals: Comparing Theory with Experiment in Making and Breaking Halogen Bonds in Solid State

2020· preprint· en· W3207686858 on OpenAlexaff
Filip Topić, Mihails Arhangelskis, Poppy Hindle, Ricky Tran, Andrew J. Morris, Dominik Cinčić, Tomislav Friščić

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCocrystalHalogenHalogen bondStoichiometryDensity functional theoryOctaneSolid-statePolymorphism (computer science)Materials scienceCrystallographyChemistryComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryHydrogen bondMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanochemical re-investigation of the halogen-bonded cocrystallization of 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane and 1,2-diiodotetraflurobenzene revealed an unexpectedly complex system, with three distinct cocrystal compositions, one of which also exhibits temperature-dependent polymorphism. This provided an opportunity to experimentally test the ability of dispersion-corrected periodic density functional theory (DFT) not only to explain the formation, but also predict the interconversion between halogen-bonded cocrystals of different stoichiometries,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207