Semi-Distributed Resource Management in UAV-Aided MEC Systems: A Multi-Agent Federated Reinforcement Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled multi-access edge computing (MEC) has been introduced as a promising edge paradigm for the future space-aerial-terrestrial integrated communications. Due to the high maneuverability of UAVs, such a flexible paradigm can improve the communication and computation performance for multiple user equipments (UEs). In this paper, we consider the sum power minimization problem by jointly optimizing resource allocation, user association, and power control in an MEC system with multiple UAVs. Since the problem is nonconvex, we propose a centralized multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithm to solve it. However, the centralized method ignores essential issues like distributed framework and privacy concern. We then propose a multi-agent federated reinforcement learning (MAFRL) algorithm in a semi-distributed framework. Meanwhile, we introduce the Gaussian differentials to protect the privacy of all UEs. Simulation results show that the semi-distributed MAFRL algorithm achieves close performances to the centralized MARL algorithm and significantly outperform the benchmark schemes. Moreover, the semi-distributed MAFRL algorithm costs 23$\%$lower opeartion time than the centralized algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".