MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3207755099 · doi:10.1101/2021.10.13.464139

An atlas of white matter anatomy, its variability, and reproducibility based on Constrained Spherical Deconvolution of diffusion MRI

2021· preprint· en· W3207755099 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed Radwan, Stefan Sunaert, Kurt G. Schilling, Maxime Descoteaux, Bennett A. Landman, Mathieu Vandenbulcke, Tom Theys, Patrick Dupont, Louise Emsell

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de SherbrookeVlaamse regeringKU LeuvenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDiffusion MRITractographyWhite matterFornixAnatomyFractional anisotropyHuman Connectome ProjectComputer scienceReproducibilityArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)NeuroscienceCartographyPsychologyBiologyMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingMathematicsRadiologyFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Virtual dissection of white matter (WM) using diffusion MRI tractography is confounded by its poor reproducibility. Despite the increased adoption of advanced reconstruction models, early region-of-interest driven protocols based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) remain the dominant reference for virtual dissection protocols. Here we bridge this gap by providing a comprehensive description of typical WM anatomy reconstructed using a reproducible automated subject-specific parcellation-based approach based on probabilistic constrained-spherical deconvolution (CSD) tractography. We complement this with a WM template in MNI space comprising 68 bundles, including all associated anatomical tract selection labels and associated automated workflows. Additionally, we demonstrate bundle inter- and intra-subject variability using 40 (20 test-retest) datasets from the human connectome project (HCP) and 5 sessions with varying b-values and number of b-shells from the single-subject Multiple Acquisitions for Standardization of Structural Imaging Validation and Evaluation (MASSIVE) dataset. The most reliably reconstructed bundles were the whole pyramidal tracts, primary corticospinal tracts, whole superior longitudinal fasciculi, frontal, parietal and occipital segments of the corpus callosum and middle cerebellar peduncles. More variability was found in less dense bundles, e.g., the first segment of the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix, dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTT), and premotor pyramidal tract. Using the DRTT as an example, we show that this variability can be reduced by using a higher number of seeding attempts. Overall inter-session similarity was high for HCP test-retest data (median weighted-dice = 0.963, stdev = 0.201 and IQR = 0.099). Compared to the HCP-template bundles there was a high level of agreement for the HCP test-retest data (median weighted-dice = 0.747, stdev = 0.220 and IQR = 0.277) and for the MASSIVE data (median weighted-dice = 0.767, stdev = 0.255 and IQR = 0.338). In summary, this WM atlas provides an overview of the capabilities and limitations of automated subject-specific probabilistic CSD tractography for mapping white matter fasciculi in healthy adults. It will be most useful in applications requiring a highly reproducible parcellation-based dissection protocol, as well as being an educational resource for applied neuroimaging and clinical professionals. Graphical abstract (Top) shows the FWT pipeline for both CSTs, AF, and motor CC bundles. (Left to right) show the required input structural parcellation maps and a priori atlases for FWT and the resulting virtual dissection include/exclude VOIs. FWT provides two approaches to virtual dissection: (1) is a bundle-specific approach where streamlines are only seeded for the bundle of interest, (2) is a whole brain tractography followed by streamlines segmentation, (top right) shows output tractograms. (Middle) Group-averaged T1 and fODF images are generated from the HCP test-retest data, and FWT is applied to generate the HCP-atlas using the bundle-specific approach (1*). FWT’s whole brain tracking and segmentation approach (2*) was applied to the HCP and MASSIVE dataset (right and left) and conducted model-based, and pair-wise similarity analyses and generated voxel-wise cumulative maps per bundle. FWT= Fun With Tracts, FS= FreeSurfer, MSBP= MultiScaleBrainParcellator, PD25= NIST Parkinson’s histological, JHU= John’s Hopkins university, Juelich= Juelich university histological atlas, AC/PC= anterior commissure/posterior commissure) UKBB= UK Biobank, SUIT (spatially unbiased cerebellar atlas template), dMRI= diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, CSD= constrained spherical deconvolution, fODF= fiber orientation distribution function, CST= corticospinal tract, AF= arcuate fasciculus, CC= corpus callosum, HCP= human connectome project, MASSIVE= Multiple acquisitions for standardization of structural imaging validation and evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→