SAR Image Registration Based on ROEWA-Blocks and Multiscale Circle Descriptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given the imaging characteristics of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images and the inherent speckle noise in them, scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) based algorithms are unable to perform satisfactorily. To improve registration efficiency between SAR images, we propose a robust and efficient registration method with three main contributions. First, considering sudden dark patches appearing in SAR images, we propose the ratio of exponentially weighted average blocks to suppress the sudden dark patches and better adapt to different test images. This new operator called blocks of the ratio of exponentially weighted averages (ROEWA-B), divides the processing windows of ROEWA into blocks, which can not only reduce speckle noise but also retain more edge details compared to ROEWA when sudden dark patches appear. Second, for outlier removal, we present an approach using the minimum moment map to remove erroneous keypoints. Finally, based on the gradient location orientation histogram descriptor, we propose a novel multiscale circle descriptor, which combines scale change information to give weights to feature points at different scales. Experimental results for various thresholds and evaluations demonstrate the advantage and robustness of our method in registration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".