The Evolution and Fusion of the Organic Combination of Confucian and Legal Traditional Cultural Philosophy Education Thoughts and Ideological and Political Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Confucianism and Legalism played an important role in China's ancient feudal society. The value of the times and spiritual connotation derived from their ideological system also play an important role in modern and contemporary times. Fully compare the similarities and differences between Confucianism and law, deeply understand the profound meaning of Confucianism's rule of etiquette, rule of virtue and Legalism's rule of law thoughts, and merge them. The introduction of ideological and political education concepts into China from the west has brought scientific methods and advanced models of modern education, but it cannot be totally westernized and ignores reality. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to explore the similarities with ideological and political education concepts on the theoretical basis of studying ancient Chinese Confucianism and French culture, analyze the development and integration paths of the two education modes, and explore their respective advantages and disadvantages. This article will use the research method of specific analysis of specific problems to make data comparison and draw a conclusion. Carry out theoretical innovation to find the applicable scope of the combination of the two education modes. The results of the study show that there are many similarities between the two ideas about education, and 56% of the interviewees think that they have influence on modern education. Moreover, combined with the characteristics of the current era, they can be endowed with many newer things, fully absorbed and transformed, and added with a new perspective. Therefore, a deep analysis of traditional cultural thoughts, screening and utilization of ideological and political education concepts, analysis of different education modes of their respective use scenarios and deficiencies, and innovation and integration guided by these theories, provide valuable experience for the development of modern education concepts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".