MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207781358 · doi:10.1117/12.2600871

Heterogeneous integration of transfer bonded terahertz quantum cascade lasers for improved heat management and light coupling

2021· article· en· W3207781358 on OpenAlexaff
Siyi Wang, Chao Xu, Z. R. Wasilewski, Dayan Ban

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTerahertz radiationOptoelectronicsHeat sinkPulse durationLaserGallium arsenideThermal conductivityLasing thresholdJoule heatingSubstrate (aquarium)OpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terahertz quantum cascade lasers (THz QCLs) in metal-metal (MM) ridge waveguides have been fabricated and hetero bonded on aluminum nitride (AlN) substrate as heat sink submount. Compared with the conventional structure of THz QCLs in MM waveguides on gallium arsenide (GaAs) as receptor substrate, AlN performs superior heat dissipation properties for thermal management due to its much higher thermal conductivity. The light–current density–voltage (L-J-V) characterization shows comparable maximum operating temperature (Tmax) at 93-95 K for both THz QCLs bonded on AlN and GaAs under short pulse injection (250 ns). However, as the injected pulse duration increases for THz QCLs on GaAs, the light intensity drops quickly, eventually leading to lasing quenching when the pulse duration is above 30 µs at 80 K (heat sink temperature). On the other hand, THz QCL on AlN shows much stronger light intensity and slower decrease with the increase of the pulse duration; for example, the light intensity is 100 times higher for the THz QCL on AlN (pulse duration of 40 µs) than THz QCL on GaAs (pulse duration of 30 µs) at the same measurement conditions at 80 K. This study shows suspected joule heating plays a great role on THz QCLs operating from long duty cycle towards continuous-wave (CW) mode, indicating AlN substrate as a high thermal conductivity material produces superior thermal management for heat extraction and dissipation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207