MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207800312 · doi:10.53660/conj-156-225

Água e sustentabilidade dos ecossistemas naturais: consequências de ocupações irregulares no Rio Paciência

2021· article· pt· W3207800312 on OpenAlexaff
Walter Rodrigues Marques, André Nogueira Machado, Waldelice Oliveira Almeida, Ana Paula Cerqueira Marques, Ana Valéria Lucena Lima Assunção, Vânia Pimentel Silva, Francisca Maria Rodrigues Marques

Bibliographic record

VenueConjecturas · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability and Education
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pesquisa investigou a relação entre água e sustentabilidade de ecossistemas naturais decorrentes de ocupações irregulares, tendo como referência a Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Paciência e afluentes. Relatou brevemente sobre as bacias hidrográficas do Maranhão e da Ilha do Maranhão, destacando do Paciência. Utilizou-se como estudo de caso, a ocupação irregular de um sítio da APACO (Associação dos Produtores e Agricultores da Cidade Operária) a partir dos laudos técnicos da Defesa Civil Municipal de São Luís. Os técnicos, com base em quatro laudos, relataram que a área era inadequada para habitação, sendo propícia a plantações. Os laudos apontam irregularidades na construção das habitações, das fossas, apontando para a contaminação dos lençóis freáticos. Além dos apontamentos da Defesa Civil, há também o descarte de outros dejetos e resíduos sólidos na área, consequência da atuação antrópica, a qual está localizada na Bacia do Rio Paciência. Embora a APACO não esteja sendo apontada neste estudo como culpada pela contaminação ou assoreamento do Rio, o fato da ocupação irregular do espaço localizado no curso superior do rio, a torna propícia e em situação análoga para estudos e pesquisas de impactos ambientais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConjecturasSame topicEnvironmental Sustainability and EducationFrench-language works237,207