Effects of bi-stable grounded nonlinear energy sink on energy dissipation of the system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, one of the most efficient passive absorbers, called nonlinear energy sink (NES), is analytically studied. A two-degree-of-freedom system is considered which consists of a linear oscillator (LO) with a base excitation and an NES, called grounded NES (GNES), which is connected to the ground with a nonlinear spring. In this study, we proposed a new arrangement of potential elements in GNES and studied invariant manifolds of the system, as well as the energy absorption performance of the NES. The system is considered in the vicinity of 1:1 resonance to investigate the strongly modulated response (SMR). To this end, after obtaining the equations of motion, the Manevitch complex variable and multiple scale method are applied to solve the equations, analytically. Then, the slow invariant manifold (SIM) is obtained. Also, the energy dissipation ratio of the NES and the percentage of the instantaneous total energy stored in the NES are calculated via the time-amplitude diagram. The results show that when the nonlinear effect decreases, the occurrence of energy pumping is less probable. Also, when the excitation amplitude decreases, the percentage of the instantaneous total energy stored in the NES increases as well as the amount of energy dissipation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".