MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207869643 · doi:10.1177/14644193211046094

Effects of bi-stable grounded nonlinear energy sink on energy dissipation of the system

2021· article· en· W3207869643 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Khalatbari, Amir Jalali, Habib Ahmadi, Kamran Foroutan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part K Journal of Multi-body Dynamics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipationNonlinear systemAmplitudeExcitationInvariant manifoldSink (geography)PhysicsMechanicsInvariant (physics)Control theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, one of the most efficient passive absorbers, called nonlinear energy sink (NES), is analytically studied. A two-degree-of-freedom system is considered which consists of a linear oscillator (LO) with a base excitation and an NES, called grounded NES (GNES), which is connected to the ground with a nonlinear spring. In this study, we proposed a new arrangement of potential elements in GNES and studied invariant manifolds of the system, as well as the energy absorption performance of the NES. The system is considered in the vicinity of 1:1 resonance to investigate the strongly modulated response (SMR). To this end, after obtaining the equations of motion, the Manevitch complex variable and multiple scale method are applied to solve the equations, analytically. Then, the slow invariant manifold (SIM) is obtained. Also, the energy dissipation ratio of the NES and the percentage of the instantaneous total energy stored in the NES are calculated via the time-amplitude diagram. The results show that when the nonlinear effect decreases, the occurrence of energy pumping is less probable. Also, when the excitation amplitude decreases, the percentage of the instantaneous total energy stored in the NES increases as well as the amount of energy dissipation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part K Journal of Multi-body DynamicsSame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207