Smooth-threshold multivariate genetic prediction incorporating gene–environment interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a genetic prediction modeling approach for genome-wide association study (GWAS) data that can include not only marginal gene effects but also gene-environment (GxE) interaction effects-i.e., multiplicative effects of environmental factors with genes rather than merely additive effects of each. The proposed approach is a straightforward extension of our previous multiple regression-based method, STMGP (smooth-threshold multivariate genetic prediction), with the new feature being that genome-wide test statistics from a GxE interaction analysis are used to weight the corresponding variants. We develop a simple univariate regression approximation to the GxE interaction effect that allows a direct fit of the STMGP framework without modification. The sparse nature of our model automatically removes irrelevant predictors (including variants and GxE combinations), and the model is able to simultaneously incorporate multiple environmental variables. Simulation studies to evaluate the proposed method in comparison with other modeling approaches demonstrate its superior performance under the presence of GxE interaction effects. We illustrate the usefulness of our prediction model through application to real GWAS data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".