MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3207968373 · doi:10.21608/mfes.2018.104961

دور مدير المدرسة الابتدائية بمصر في زيادة وعى المعلم للتوصيف الوظيفي لمهنته(دراسة ميدانية)

2018· article· ar· W3207968373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
وفاء إبراهيم الصادق

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchool teachersMedical educationPsychologyPedagogyDescriptive researchMedicineSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

يهدف البحث الحالي إلى التعرف على دور مدير المدرسة الابتدائية بمصر في زيادة وعى المعلم للتوصيف الوظيفي لمهنته, مع استعراض خبرة کندا والولايات المتحدة في هذا المجال, واعتمدت الباحثة على المنهج الوصفي التحليلي, مع إعداد استبانه للتعرف على دور مدير المدرسة الابتدائية في زيادة وعى المعلم للتوصيف الوظيفي لمهنته, ومدى وعى المعلمين أنفسهم بأدوارهم في ضوء التوصيف الوظيفى لهم, وتوصل البحث إلى أن المدير يقوم  ببذل جهد کبير لزيادة وعى معلم المرحلة الابتدائية في مصر للتوصيف الوظيفي لمهنته وتبعا لذلک تم وضع خطة مقترحة لزيادة فاعلية دور المدير في هذا المجال. The current research aims to know the role of primary school administrator in Egypt to increase the teachers awareness of their occupational description, also it presents Canadian and American experience in this field. The research depended on the descriptive analystical method, questionnaire aims to know the role of primary school administrator in Egypt to increase the teachers awareness of their occupational description, also to know the limit of teachers awareness of their roles in the light of the occupational description.   It revealed that administrator makes all his efforts to increase the teachers awareness of their occupational description, the Asuggestion has been supposed to increase the effectiveness of the role of primary school administrator  in the this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1710.151

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Practices and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207