MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208041258 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac2739

Keck/OSIRIS Paβ High-contrast Imaging and Updated Constraints on PDS 70b

2021· article· en· W3208041258 on OpenAlexaff
Taichi Uyama, Chen Xie, Yuhiko Aoyama, Charles Beichman, Jun Hashimoto, Ruobing Dong, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Masahiro Ikoma, Dimitri Mawet, Michael W. McElwain, Jean-Baptiste Ruffio, Kevin Wagner, Jason Wang, Yifan Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceSpace Telescope Science Institute
KeywordsOsirisPhysicsPhotosphereAstrophysicsLine (geometry)H-alphaEmission spectrumInfraredHigh contrastOpticsSpectral lineAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a high-contrast imaging search for Pa β line emission from protoplanets in the PDS 70 system with Keck/OSIRIS integral field spectroscopy. We applied the high-resolution spectral differential imaging technique to the OSIRIS J -band data but did not detect the Pa β line at the level predicted using the parameters of Hashimoto et al. (2020). This lack of Pa β emission suggests the MUSE-based study may have overestimated the line width of H α . We compared our Pa β detection limits with the previous H α flux and H β limits and estimated A V to be ∼0.9 and 2.0 for PDS 70 b and c, respectively. In particular, PDS 70 b’s A V is much smaller than implied by high-contrast near-infrared studies, which suggests the infrared-continuum photosphere and the hydrogen-emitting regions exist at different heights above the forming planet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207