A Fusion Method of Optical Image and SAR Image Based on Dense-UGAN and Gram–Schmidt Transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To solve the problems such as obvious speckle noise and serious spectral distortion when existing fusion methods are applied to the fusion of optical and SAR images, this paper proposes a fusion method for optical and SAR images based on Dense-UGAN and Gram–Schmidt transformation. Firstly, dense connection with U-shaped network (Dense-UGAN) are used in GAN generator to deepen the network structure and obtain deeper source image information. Secondly, according to the particularity of SAR imaging mechanism, SGLCM loss for preserving SAR texture features and PSNR loss for reducing SAR speckle noise are introduced into the generator loss function. Meanwhile in order to keep more SAR image structure, SSIM loss is introduced to discriminator loss function to make the generated image retain more spatial features. In this way, the generated high-resolution image has both optical contour characteristics and SAR texture characteristics. Finally, the GS transformation of optical and generated image retains the necessary spectral properties. Experimental results show that the proposed method can well preserve the spectral information of optical images and texture information of SAR images, and also reduce the generation of speckle noise at the same time. The metrics are superior to other algorithms that currently perform well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".