Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This PhD research focuses on young people’s religious identities and wellbeing in contemporary western and predominantly secular societies. Specifically, I examined how young Muslims experience and navigate their religious identities and beliefs while growing up in a Muslim minority context. In so doing, I depart from a geographic perspective. The main purpose is to explain the role of places in how young Muslims navigate their religious identities and beliefs while moving from youth to young adulthood, and to explore how these processes relate to wellbeing. The experiences and perceptions of a diverse group of young Muslims are centralised by focusing on how they 'live' religion, perceive their changing religious identities and beliefs, and if and how the spatial context mattered in that regard. A qualitative research approach is adopted, and fieldwork took place in three different research urban contexts: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, Vancouver, Canada, and Groningen, The Netherlands. In-depth interviews and map-making techniques were used to collect data. This led to rich data enveloping diverse individual narratives which included the spatiotemporal complexities of identity, belonging, lived religion, and wellbeing. The chapters of this thesis provided empirical, theoretical, and methodological insights that contributed to the main purpose of this thesis. One of the claims is that in order to become more inclusive towards Muslims, it is essential to create places for religion in the public domains of western and predominantly secular societies. Places for religion does not refer to designated ‘religious’ or ‘sacred’ places.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it