Comparaison de la perception des exigences professionnelles par les futurs enseignants du primaire à la fin des première, deuxième et troisième années de formation à l’enseignement à Zurich (Suisse)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Formation et profession 29(3), 202 sum Nous prsentons les rsultats d'une recherche ralise auprs de futurs enseignants de Zurich (Suisse) et base sur une approche longitudinale comptant trois sessions de collecte de donnes. Pour ce faire, 153 tudiants d'une seule cohorte ont rpondu un questionnaire trois moments de leur formation : en premire, deuxime et troisime anne. L' outil EABest-K (Keller-Schneider, 2014) comporte 29 questions couvrant sept domaines d' exigences professionnelles values chacune sous trois angles par les tudiants : le degr de sollicitation d'une exigence, le sentiment de comptence vis--vis de cette exigence et la perception de sa pertinence. Nous concluons avec des pistes pour une recherche conscutive canado-suisse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it