MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208147691 · doi:10.4000/ifha.11532

Ulrike Hohensee, Mathias Lawo, Michael Lindner, Olaf B. Rader (éd.), Dokumente zur Geschichte des Deutschen Reiches und seiner Verfassung. 1362-1365, Teil 1: 1362-1364

2021· article· de· W3208147691 on OpenAlexaff
Christa Birkel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2021
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le projet académique Monumenta Germaniae Historica, basé à l'Académie des sciences de Berlin-Brandebourg, est actuellement chargé de la publication de sources sur l'histoire du Saint-Empire romain et sa constitution au XIVe siècle. L'équipe de rédacteurs sous la direction de Michael Menzel a pour tâche de mener à terme la série des Constitutiones et acta publica imperatorum et regem, déjà entamée à la fin du XIXe siècle. Dans ce contexte, il s’agit d’identifier et d’éditer les chartes pertin...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207