MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208168621 · doi:10.4000/communication.2204

Serge PROULX, Louise POISSANT et Michel SÉNÉCAL (dir.) (2006), Communautés virtuelles : penser et agir en réseau / Amaury DAELE et Bernadette CHARLIER (dir.) (2006), Comprendre les communautés virtuelles d’enseignants. Pratiques et recherches

2010· article· fr· W3208168621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Peraya

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il est des comptes rendus plus difficiles à rédiger que d’autres. Écrire à propos de l’ouvrage Communautés virtuelles : penser et agir en réseau est de ceux-là. C’est en lisant, dans la foulée et comme en contrepoint, l’ouvrage dirigé par Daele et Charlier que nous avons pu mieux identifier, avec du recul, notre malaise. Nous présenterons de façon plus détaillée le premier ouvrage puisqu’il constituait, au départ, l’objet de cette lecture critique. Puis nous mettrons en évidence, dans le seco...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207