MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208175508 · doi:10.1155/2021/9231451

Mining Travel Time of Airport Ferry Network Based on Historical Trajectory Data

2021· article· en· W3208175508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cong Ding, Jun Bi, Dongfan Xie, Xiaomei Zhao, Yi Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsScheduleTransport engineeringTravel timeShortest path problemComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemOperations researchScheduling (production processes)Terminal (telecommunication)GraphReal-time computingEngineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An airport ferry vehicle is a ground service vehicle used to transfer passengers between the far apron and the terminal. The travel time of ferry tasks in the airport ferry network is an important decision-making basis for ferry vehicle scheduling. This paper presents a graph-based method to mine the travel time between nodes in the airport ferry network. Firstly, combined with map and trajectory information, the method takes the terminal boarding gates, parking lots, and remote stands as road network nodes to build a complete airport ferry road network. Then, this paper uses big data processing technology to identify the travel time between regional connection nodes by data fusion through the temporal and spatial relationship between flight schedule and ferry vehicle GPS travel trajectory. Finally, the Floyd shortest path algorithm in graph theory is used to obtain the shortest path and travel time of all OD points. The experimental results show that all the ferry times calculated by the method proposed in this paper can better reflect the actual driving situation. This method saves the manpower, material resources, and time cost of on-site investigation and lays a foundation for the scheduling of ferry vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207